Trying to determine what the data provided anywhere else means is a waste of time.ĮxpertFlyer and other tools may work well with US-based airlines, as the bulk of the paying customers are probably based there, and those airlines are of most interest to ExpertFlyer customers.Ĭlearly, the results for Flying Blue are not accurate.
Checking anywhere else is a waste of time.
EXECUTIVE ASSAULT 2 V0.429.1 UPGRADE
If the Flying Blue tool won't offer a Classic Award at the lowest rate, there is no "O" for you to upgrade into. You shouldn't be getting a full printout of all possible classes when querying Award space.Īnd, as stated above, the only correct and easily-verified source for this information is Flying Blue. See for example, this thumbnail fromt he "Airline Award & Upgrade " feature of this page: The result you have printed out above cannot possible relate toa "miles only" query, as you have the full set of (cash) fares. It was my understanding that looking up award availability was different in Experflyer than looking up general (cash) availability you should only be presented with that limited subset of fareclasses used for Awards, and only in the context of using miles. It is also strange to see it set to "9", as I doubt KLM would ever dream of allowing 9 business class redemptions on a single flight. "O" is indeed supposed to be reserved for Award Bookings, so it is strange to see it listed with all the revenue classes. Unfortunately I cannot check an upgrade, because my Skymiles number is added to the booking.I am unfamiliar with ExpertFlyer, but that presentation looks wrong. So usually there should be a posibility for an upgrade. U9 K9 H9 L9 Q9 T9 E0 N9 R0 V0 X0) and Flying Blue? And also if I check in my Flying Blue account I can book an award ticket. But maybe anyone knows that diference between expertflyer ( J9 C9 D9 I9 Z9 O9 W9 S9 A9 Y9 B9 M9
0 kommentar(er)
